CHA, Rosenaus settle 21-month legal battle
More than a year after his graduation,
the school
will award Andrew Rosenau his diploma.
by MICHAEL J. MISHAK
Chestnut Hill Academy's case with former student Andrew
Rosenau, whom the school sought to dismiss in 2002,
quietly came to an end Monday morning in City Hall
Court Room 443.
After two hours of settlement negotiations, Philadelphia
Common Pleas Court Judge Gene D. Cohen announced, "both
parties have come to an agreement." Though the
financial terms of the settlement were kept confidential,
Cohen said Andrew Rosenau would be awarded the diploma
he was denied when he graduated from Chestnut Hill
Academy in 2003. Also, Andrew Rosenau would receive "full
status" as an alumnus of the school, he said.
Cohen called the settlement "fair and equitable."
The last-minute deal came three days after a Common
Pleas Court judge denied Chestnut Hill Academy's motion
for summary judgment, a court order ruling that a case
can be decided upon established facts without a trial.
The civil trial had been set for Monday, August 16,
but legal counsel for both Chestnut Hill Academy and
the Rosenaus took turns meeting with Judge Cohen before
any proceedings began.
Both parties respected the center aisle as each conferred
with their attorneys amid crates and boxes of documents.
When approached after the settlement announcement,
both former CHA dean of students Jerome Murphy and
former head of upper school Judd Levingston declined
comment.
Murphy resigned in May after he admitted, in a sworn
deposition, to writing a warning letter to Andrew Rosenau's
college of choice, Lehigh University. The letter violated
a court order that enjoined Chestnut Hill Academy from
doing anything to harm Rosenau's education.
Reached by phone, CHA head of school Frank Steel said
Andrew Rosenau would receive his diploma "as quickly
as possible," in compliance with Judge Cohen's
order. "That's the way it ought to be," Steel
said. "I'm not going to have the school drag its
feet to keep it from happening. I'm glad we've been
able to resolve the matter. The Rosenaus can move on,
and so can the school."
The Rosenaus, who had planned to press the school
for damages and legal expenses, also declined comment,
citing a confidentiality agreement.
In 2002, Chestnut Hill Academy moved to expel Andrew
Rosenau for his participation in an off-campus incident
where he and a CHA junior conspired to photograph the
junior's girlfriend without her knowledge. The photos,
which were destroyed before any adults, including school
administrators, saw them, allegedly contained images
of the young couple embracing. Both the school and
the Rosenaus agreed the photos did not contain any
nudity.
The school has said their decision — asking
Andrew to withdraw or face expulsion — was, in
part, based on the argument that Andrew invaded the
young woman's privacy by recording her and subsequently
showing that recording to a group of CHA students.
The girl involved in the incident did not press charges
against either of the two CHA students, and did not
seek disciplinary action.
The Rosenaus successfully moved to enjoin the school
from interrupting their son's education through a court
order. Andrew received instruction at home using CHA
materials for the remainder of his senior year. Though
he was officially graduated, he never received his
diploma.
The private, all-male school had filed an appeal,
seeking to reverse the injunction that compelled the
school to educate Rosenau, but Andrew graduated before
it reached the Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Both the common pleas and superior courts recognized
Chestnut Hill Academy did not follow its own policy
for disciplinary action. Andrew Rosenau had attended
the school for 13 years without incident prior to November
2002. Common Pleas Court Judge Matthew Carrafiello
wrote, "this court found it likely the Rosenaus
will prevail in trial," in his February 2003 opinion.
Andrew Rosenau will begin his sophomore year