What’s wrong (and right) with the Barrymore Awards When
the Barrymore Awards for Excellence in Theatre were established
in 1994, the entire theater community rallied around them.
Everyone enthusiastically endorsed the related ideas of
creating a series of awards for Philadelphia theater artists
that could help forge the local theater folk into a real
community. At
first it seemed to work. Then, hardly unexpectedly, the
losers began finding fault. Some theaters complained that
they were discriminated against. Despite the complaints,
however, the awards gave the local theater artists an opportunity
to celebrate. They made visible a community that in 1980
began growing from its status as a road show stop to the
city with the largest number of Actor’s Equity League
of Regional Theatre (LORT) contracts anywhere outside of
New York City. The
community has thrived. The Barrymores, whose 2003 awards
ceremony was held October 27 at the University of Pennsylvania’s
Annenberg Center, have undergone some changes. All in all,
they remain an asset. At
last week’s ceremony, lots of very deserving people
were honored, none more so than Tom McCarthy, the dean of
Philadelphia actors who received the Lifetime Achievement
Award. Also
deserving this year was the recognition given to the People’s
Light and Theatre Company’s production of Suzan-Lori
Park’s In the Blood, a brilliant production
of a play that was a courageous stretch for our senior professional
acting ensemble. It was about time that local actress Marcia
Saunders was honored. She won the supporting actress Barrymore
for her role in People’s Light’s A Delicate
Balance. In the realm
of vanilla and chocolate, I was surprised and disappointed
that the 1812 Productions offering of the creatively quirky
Bat Boy: The Musical and Arden’s terrific rendering
of Stephen Sondheim’s problematic Pacific Overtures
didn’t receive more recognition. Had I been a
voter, I would have chosen Bat Boy’s Ben Dibble over Green Violin’s Raúl
Esparza, as good as he was, for the leading actor in a musical. The
ceremony itself has always been something of a self-indulgent
affair, some of them more entertaining than others. When
the producers tapped the terrific young local actor Tony
Braithwaite to emcee three years ago, it looked as if we
had found our own Billy Crystal. He’s
irreverent, appealing, hip, talented and very funny. This
year, however, he went on too long. The ceremony, which
came in at slightly more than two hours in the early days,
took three and one-half hours (3:24, to be exact), a long
period to keep people’s attention under the best of
circumstances, let alone without any potty breaks. With
a few minor exceptions (the bits with the sign language
interpreters went on too long, and the reading of the list
of sponsors was extended beyond tolerance), Braithwaite
was his delightful self. It would have been better, however,
if he had delivered a shorter opening monologue. The
Barrymores should keep Braithwaite but find a way to get
the awards ceremony back under two and one-half hours. This
year not one of the winners went on too long, so it was
the other stuff — Braithwaite, the excerpts from the
musicals and the short synopses of the plays and some other
business that wasn’t directly related to the awards
— that needs to be tightened. After
nine years of awards, most of which have been won by Philadelphia-based
artists, it’s time the Barrymores grew up and stopped
complaining that actors from New York sometimes show up
as nominees. Also,
the Walnut Street Theatre’s absence diminishes the
program. Over the years the area’s largest theater
has won several awards. It has also been denied nominations
it probably deserved. It may be that the volunteer nominators
and judges hold the Walnut to higher standards. That’s
a problem which could easily be overcome by training the
nominators and reinstating an appeals process. If a theater
thinks it has been wrongly overlooked, it could appeal,
perhaps to a group of three or four theater professionals
(critics, producers, artists, etc.) who would then take
a look and either affirm or overturn the original decision.
With clear
guidelines, the appeals process should help. It devalues
the Barrymores if all theaters do not participate, especially
the largest in town. The Walnut should swallow its pride
and rejoin the fold. |
Letters | Opinion | News | LocalLife | This Week | Sports | News Makers | About Us

