Editorials & Opinions Vote
on the issues After
weeks of campaigning, the election for mayor, district councilperson
and councilpersons-at-large is finally here. This year’s
election has been a difficult one with federal probes, accusations,
vandalism and embezzlement charges. But
it is the fact that race has been drawn into this year’s
campaign in a way that Philadelphia has not seen in decades
that could have a polarizing, negative effect on the region.
The reports that support for the mayoral candidates is along
racial lines are particularly painful and depressing. Didn’t
Philadelphians — especially those of us in Chestnut
Hill and Mt. Airy — get over that decades ago? There
are many issues ranging from education to taxes to public
safety and the business climate that affect all of us. Study
the issues. Think about the future and who best can serve
Philadelphia. Go to the polls on Tuesday. Katie
Worrall Planning ahead Watch your U.S. mail pile for a colorful
brochure from the Chestnut Hill Community Fund. The brochure,
designed by the production department of the Chestnut Hill
Local, describes the 2004 campaign to raise money for community
projects and local organizations ranging from the Bach Festival,
which sponsors classical music concerts, and the Chestnut
Hill Senior Services Center, to planting of street trees,
Pastorius Park concerts and Teenagers, Inc. The 2004 fundraising
committee, chaired by Brien P. Tilley, is working to raise
$120,000 by December 31 for these programs and others that
retain Chestnut Hill’s cultural and architectural
integrity and its “Greene Countrie” town atmosphere.
Tax-deductible contributions to the Chestnut Hill Community
Fund may be made by sending a check to the fund, 8434 Germantown
Ave., Philadelphia, PA 19118, or by credit card by calling
215-248-8810 or visiting www.chestnuthill.org. Opinion:
A vote for Mayor Street by
CAROL COPE I’m
going to vote for John Street next week because he’s
earned my vote. He’s earned it with 25 years of public
service and earned it with the substantial accomplishments
of his first four years as mayor. Consider the following: Bright
lights and lower taxes At
a time when cities and states all over the country are raising
taxes, cutting services and plunging into debt (Pittsburgh
is struggling with a $60-$80 million deficit and has seen
its bond rating sink to junk), Philadelphia retains a marginal
surplus and the city’s credit rating remains the same
as it was at the end of Mayor Rendell’s term. Mayor
Street’s common sense fiscal policy has led to wage
and business privilege tax cuts for four years in a row,
a policy he pledges to continue. The mayor also took on
the Pennsylvania Insurance Department and won very real
auto insurance rate rollbacks for 70 percent of Philadelphia’s
drivers. Center
City continues to thrive with the opening of the National
Constitution Center, plans under way for two major museums
on the Parkway, near-completion of the Schuylkill River
Recreation Project and two new high-rise office buildings
on the horizon. The Street administration has created or
preserved 36,000 jobs through strategic incentive financing
and tax credits. A new program to attract biotech businesses
is in motion, and Center City has seen growing numbers of
young professional residents moving in. Real
progress in education Early
in his administration, Mayor Street thwarted an outright
takeover of the school district by the state, and kept Edison
and privatization out of school district management. His
dogged efforts have forged a real partnership with Harrisburg
Republicans, ensuring a strong city vote in the education
process. The partnership has brought skilled new educator
Paul Vallas to Philadelphia and, astonishingly, invested
$75 million more state dollars right here in the school
district. For the first time in my memory, we are hearing
really good news about our public schools. For
children and families The
mayor has led an unprecedented expansion of after-school,
parenting support and youth development services to strengthen
families, growing funding for these services from $14 million
to $74 million a year, increasing the number of children
served from 4,000 to 40,000. In
the works, thanks to Mayor Street, is a $30 million citywide
library capital program and a soon-to-be $10 million in
funds to improve health and safety in child care programs. The
Street administration’s strategic investment in lead
hazard programs has already cut in half the number of children
tested positive for lead poisoning. In
fighting crime Since
Mayor Street took office and established his Operation Safe
Streets campaign, overall crime is down 20 percent. Last
year alone, overall crime was down 11 percent and the number
of homicides in the city was at an 18-year-low. Drug seizures
are up from $14 million to nearly $65 million, and arrests
of drug dealers by the Narcotics Bureau are up from 3,990
to 4,701. The foregoing stats are based on comparisons between
May-December 2001 and May-December 2002 and they demonstrate
measurable improvement in crime fighting. But the numbers
alone are not enough. At least as important is the sense
among residents in neighborhoods most adversely affected
by crime that they have been able to take back their streets,
to walk to the corner store, to sit outside on the stoop
with their children. A recent Keystone Survey conducted
by Millersville University’s Terry Madonna demonstrated
that three out of four of all people surveyed were familiar
with Operation Safe Streets and 74 percent of that group
said the program was working very or fairly well. Such positive
perceptions are indicators at least as important as hard
numbers, and a real measure of progress. In
erasing blight Without
turning his back on Center City, Mayor Street has expanded
the Rendell Renaissance to the neighborhoods. His comprehensive
Neighborhood Transformation Initiative (NTI) has already
cleaned 32,000 lots, demolished hundreds of dilapidated
buildings, cleared graffiti from 210,000 properties, removed
190,000 abandoned cars and 12,000 dead and dangerous trees.
The Mayor has formed partnerships with local banks to make
more than $100 million in mortgage and repair money available
to formerly red-lined neighborhoods. Of course these efforts
are only the beginning. Anyone familiar with the sea of
derelict factories and decaying houses that spread over
Philadelphia knows that 50 years of damage and decay will
take more than four years to heal. But Mayor Street has
made a start, and if continued, NTI will pave the way for
housing and commercial development and with it a revitalized
city economic base. Meanwhile,
Mr. Katz introduces gambling to Philadelphia Sam
Katz brings the enthusiasms of an eager risk-taking entrepreneur
to this debate, or perhaps less kindly stated, the nerve
of a roulette player. Dismissing the incremental tax cuts
of the Rendell/Street plans, past and future, and, for that
matter, the incremental programs of Philadelphia’s
non-partisan Tax Reform Commission, Katz proposes to slash
taxes across the board and borrow $75 million to cover operating
expenses for five years. A cynic might point out that a
five-year plan will get him safely past re-election before
the roof falls in. Mr.
Katz maintains that the tax cuts and an extensive marketing
effort will bring 63,000 jobs to Philadelphia. An Innovation
Philadelphia report, cited by the mayor during his visit
to Chestnut Hill on October 19, casts considerable doubt
on the rosy projection. It notes that during the booming
’90s the entire Philadelphia region — including
parts of Delaware and New Jersey untrammeled by Philadelphia’s
taxes — saw a net growth of just 30,000 jobs. On October
17, the Tax Reform Commission rejected the Katz deficit-financing
plan as too risky. Even estimates that project the theoretical
growth of 63,000 jobs also project an annual deficit for
the city of at least $185 million. Such a deficit will force
cuts closer to 20 percent than the Katz plan’s promoted
one percent, and will inevitably cripple the city’s
core services. (In
the October 14 KYW debate, Mr. Katz announced that he would
raise taxes if the revenues included in his original proposal
were off. This confronts city dwellers with the prospect
of higher taxes and an enormous debt load to pay off as
well.) Of
hopes and dreams On
September 21, the Inquirer called Mr. Katz’s deficit
financing plan “one of the biggest no-nos in Finance
101” and pronounced his refusal to detail the spending
cuts necessary to balance his budget “unacceptable”
and “an insult to voters.” This past Sunday,
the Inquirer endorsed Katz anyway, because “his hopes
for the city seem grander than any the incumbent can muster.”
Go figure. I,
too, have grand hopes every time I buy a lottery ticket,
with a considerably lower price tag. But Mr. Katz’s
tax cut and marketing plans fail to stir me very much, although
they have an uncomfortably familiar ring. There is a “trickle
down” feel to the Katz plan, a core conviction that
tax cuts fix everything like magic. It’s a conviction
that is certainly the driving force in the White House these
days, to our great cost as a nation. Some
say that Mayor Street is too cynical or “prickly”
or lacking in vision to lead Philadelphia effectively into
the future. The reality is that Mr. Katz’s vision,
rosy and well intended though it may be, would very likely
lead us off a cliff. The reality is that without careful
husbanding of the city’s resources we will have no
future. Mayor Street’s victorious battle to keep Edison
out of the city’s schools and his historically unprecedented
efforts for children and neighborhoods all point in the
direction he intends to lead us. It is clear that he hopes
for a city that’s rich and vibrant, neighborhoods
full of life and free of fear and decay, children healthy
and safe, families stronger, schools that truly teach. Real
progress in these things will tempt people back to our city
as surely as tax reform. They are not small, cynical goals,
at all, but the grandest of visions, and it is clear Mr.
Street knows how to fight for them. I believe we must give
him the chance. Opinion: Katz will run city as a concerned businessman by
KENNETH J. POWELL JR. In
the election on November 4, all Philadelphians who wish
to see the city grow should go to the polls, cast their
vote for the candidate whom they believe will grow the city
of Philadelphia over the next four years. This
is the most important election Philadelphians have faced
since the first election of Ed Rendell. Voters should put
aside their political philosophies, whether liberal or conservative.
Voters should forget their party affiliation. The voters
should focus on one and only one issue: who is the best
person now for the job of mayor. I will take this sense
of urgency into the voting booth on November 4. I
was born in Philadelphia over five decades ago. I was raised,
educated in Philadelphia, and have worked here ever since.
I live in Philadelphia and I hope to continue to do so. Within
the last year I was truly able to focus on how the present
state of the city has impacted me. I was forced to close
a small business I operated for 20 years, partially because
of the onerous tax situation which impacts all businesses
large and small. I closed my business and joined another
in the city of Philadelphia. Most business owners who have
decided the tax exacted by the city for the “privilege”
of doing business here is too high and have left the city. Voters
have to look at many issues before deciding for whom they
will vote. I suggest Philadelphians who read this should
be thinking of the following issues. Are
we willing to re-elect Mayor Street, who has lurched consistently
from embarrassment to embarrassment? Are we willing to re-elect
Mayor Street, who cares more about special interests, including
the special interest of his brother Milton, than the interest
of the people who live and work in the city of Philadelphia?
These questions should both be answered in the negative. Voters
should think about what Mayor Street has done. Although
the Phillies Stadium is under construction, there is little
or no new construction in the city of Philadelphia. This
is a major reason why most trade unions have abandoned Mayor
Street to endorse Sam Katz. Voters must recognize that of
the top ten cities in America, only Philadelphia and Detroit
lost population during the decade of the nineties. Do we
want to become another Detroit? Do we want to keep statistical
company with Detroit? I think not. Mayor
Street has offered only a few examples of his success. He
offers Operation Safe Streets, [a program that] has moved
drug pushers from their regular hangouts in the city of
Philadelphia to new hangouts. Crime statistics have increased.
What has Operation Safe Streets done? You need only ride
through the areas protected by this operation and you will
see police officers sitting on steps in duet talking on
cell phones or talking to each other. Their presence moves
criminal activity from the block on which they sit, but
police are not pursuing criminals, they are only dispersing
them. Mayor
Street points to the reduction in car insurance rates as
a success of his administration. Car insurance rates have
not been reduced. What has happened is more people have
selected limited tort coverage, which brings with it lower
insurance rates. Mayor
Street applauds himself for eliminating blight. A closer
look at his anti-blight project will show that the exteriors
of homes are being renovated while the interiors are left
in blight condition. The house appears to have been renovated,
but it is still uninhabitable. Likewise,
the Street administration has attempted to give the appearance
of success, but if you open the door and look in you will
see that very little, if anything, has been accomplished
to move the city forward. Sam
Katz is a proven businessperson who is running as a Republican.
Mr. Katz spent most of his life as a Democrat. He is very
forward thinking socially, and intends to run the city as
a concerned businessperson who is set on growing his business,
the city of Philadelphia. Mr.
Katz has taken his positive campaign into all neighborhoods.
Mr. Katz believes that by reducing taxes and inducing companies
to reinvest in Philadelphia, he can bring more jobs back
to Philadelphia. Mr. Katz believes that through a responsible
operation of the schools, the Convention Center and other
city agencies, people will be drawn to live and work in
the city of Philadelphia. Mr.
Katz will not forget minorities and women-operated businesses.
Mr. Katz has pledged to include them in the city’s
revitalization. Sam
Katz is a Philadelphian born and bred. His opponent is not
a native of Philadelphia. Mr. Street’s politics of
divide and conquer are harmful to all who choose to reside
in this great city. Mr. Katz wishes to bring all Philadelphians
together to benefit from the growth of the city and to celebrate
that growth. If
you objectively evaluate the candidates, you will know that
Sam Katz is the best of the two to manage and direct the
city’s future. If you focus on the real issues and
not the emotional red herrings you will vote for Sam Katz
on November 4. Kenneth
J. Powell Jr. is the Ninth Ward Republican Leader. |
Letters | Opinion | News | LocalLife | This Week | Sports | News Makers | About Us

