Perhaps no other movie genre, save for the classic western, relies more on time and place than the detective movie. Sherlock Holmes had his late Victorian era; Spade had his fog-bound San Francisco of the 1930s and 40s (updated marginally from the novel's 1920s time period) and Philip Marlowe, the direct heir to Spade’s cynical gumshoe, had his Los Angeles of the 1940s and 50s. In the novels of Raymond Chandler, a transplant from England who was born in Chicago, Los Angeles itself might be considered a character in its own right. The city is as important to these …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
You can also purchase this individual item for $1.50
We have recently launched a new and improved website. To continue reading, you will need to either log into your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a digital subscriber with an active subscription, then you already have an account here. Just reset your password if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
If you are a current print subscriber, you can set up a free website account by clicking here.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
Perhaps no other movie genre, save for the classic western, relies more on time and place than the detective movie. Sherlock Holmes had his late Victorian era; Spade had his fog-bound San Francisco of the 1930s and 40s (updated marginally from the novel's 1920s time period) and Philip Marlowe, the direct heir to Spade’s cynical gumshoe, had his Los Angeles of the 1940s and 50s. In the novels of Raymond Chandler, a transplant from England who was born in Chicago, Los Angeles itself might be considered a character in its own right. The city is as important to these stories as Marlowe himself.
Robert Altman, another transplanted Midwesterner and one of cinema’s great auteurs, adopted Los Angeles in the late 1950s and spent a decade making television shows there until his big break came with “M*A*S*H” in 1970. His films are idiosyncratic, character driven and have less to do with plot than human relations, social mores, and the worlds these characters inhabit.
“The Long Goodbye” is one of only a few Chandler novels that had not been made into a movie by the time it fell into Altman’s hands. This film keeps the story’s location in Los Angeles but updates the story from 1954 to the early 1970s, a time of social upheaval and change. As an update, the film is not just a modern take on the detective genre but rather, through Marlowe’s investigations, a commentary on the cultural idiosyncrasies and mores of mid-1970s LA. And what other city epitomizes the cultural extremes of the mid 1970s?
The thing that this movie does so accurately and satirically is to highlight the culture of narcissism and navel-gazing (note the ladies who live next door) that pervade Marlowe’s world. Marlowe comes across as a transplant from a bygone era, out of place in this world with his suit and tie, relatively short hair, 1948 Lincoln convertible Cabriolet and chain smoking straight camel cigarettes.
To highlight the lack of dialogue he has with this world he is forced to live in, he has replaced the knowing voiceover narrative trope heard in countless detective films and television shows with talking to himself under his breath as if he is trying to work out this foreign world as he stumbles through it. The world of yesterday is more predictable and more rational. The old detective can solve a case based on his astute understanding of motives and piecing together how the clock might work. In this new world these skills are useless.
In the original novel, characters act according to some plan or scheme, half-baked though they may be. As these plans unravel, the book examines regrets over broken human relations and aspirations gone wrong. In contrast, the characters in this film act according to no apparent plans or aspirations but rather follow their whims and immediate appetites with complete disregard for others. Marlowe, a decent and moral man, as film critic Roger Ebert concluded in his four-star review, pursues the path of helping those who truly don’t deserve his help and ultimately will not benefit from it.
Here are a few other brilliant quirks and details to look out for: